Spicasso
Jackie Carra, a 16 year-old aspiring artist of Irish and Puerto Rican descent, finds himself thrust into a racial powder keg ...
| Overall | |
| Concept | |
| Story Structure | |
| Character | |
| Dialogue | |
| Grammar | |
| Budget (1-Low / 5-High) | |
Rating: 2.8/5 (3 votes cast) | |
In spite of some hesitancy’s which originally result from their identities, Hans as a former Nazi officer and Sam as a young Jew, they prove that love exist independent of labels, language, religion and race, appraising and judging each other themselves.
I guess I don't see the hook. What ninja or bounty hunter wo...
This review is based on the first thirty pages (Act 1). If I...Jackie Carra, a 16 year-old aspiring artist of Irish and Puerto Rican descent, finds himself thrust into a racial powder keg ...
Whisper and Silence have been friends since childhood and they\’ve been on the run almost as long. When a corrupt polic...
A teenage boy looks to validate himself as mature by breaking up with the girlfriend he sees as shallow, and starting an impr...
Love, Lies, Deceit, Abuse, Sexism, and Homophobia affect seven associates who work at a JCPenney in the shoe department.
Filming has been announced! Visit David Ebeltoft’s IMDB page HERE Visit his film’s page HERE Visit his screenwrit...
Ever thought about Directing? Want to know if your script could attract a Hollywood Director & major talent? Shooting a ...

I had trouble working out precisely what this screenplay is about. While I think there is a good story in there somewhere, it is yet to manifest in the current version. In other words, what is the hook? What is it that the writer is really trying to say? What is it about these characters that will intrigue me and cause me to react to them (whether its empathy, anger, sadness, fear or whatever)? What is the journey we are going on with these characters – how have they changed from the start of the screenplay to the end? What the screenplay is ‘about’ at the moment is too broad. And I’m not sure the broad concept is enough to sustain the read. At present the screenplay is a collection of events and dialogue with insufficient building of tension and insufficient building of scenes – highs, lows, turmoil, testing, redemption, discovery etc along the way. Also, some of the conversations between characters are really very long, for instance at the train station with Necdet Kent. This makes the screenplay quite laboured in places as it restates an impression or understanding that we have already obtained. Perhaps this is a result of the writer having a very clear vision in their mind as to how a scene ‘should’ look. I know that I sure am prone to that! Less focus on how the scene should ‘look’ and more on how it should ‘build’ would help. Instead of the writer thinking about what they want us to see, they could think more about what it is they want to make us feel. Because all that said, I think there is a great story in there waiting to be uncovered.
Not well written. Too much discription and somewhat confusing with all the flashbacks. The dialougue, for the most part, was poor. However, the story was interesting.
I didnt have a chance to read whole thing. Rethink your logline, dont use names of actual characters in the log line